I also chose to use the stress test because thermal throttling is a real problem with some mobile SoCs and sustained performance is more relevant than a 60 second benchmark. 3DMark was important because it is cross-platform and the standard for 3D graphics performance, especially in gaming. This feels like the perfect test to use to compare AI performance across devices, especially since it does multiple types of ML workloads and tests FP32, INT16 and INT8 performance. The important part in choosing GeekBench ML was not to test CPU or GPU performance individually, but instead to test them together using the NNAPI test which is Google’s own API that it uses for ML acceleration. And when you consider how few AI benchmarks are out there and ones that are easy to run, GeekBench ML was an easy decision. To Google’s point, the company has said that it does not actually care about individual SoC component tests but rather a complete system AI test. I chose GeekBench because it’s a simple CPU benchmark and can show how Google’s decision to go with two Cortex X1 cores and two A76 cores instead of one X1 and three A78s affected overall CPU performance. Google claimed that nobody in the market was creating chips that satisfied Google’s needs for AI performance, so they created their own.įor my testing, I ran GeekBench, GeekBench ML, 3DMark Wildlife, 3DMark Wildlife Stress Test and PCMark. Nevertheless, Google’s intentions with the Tensor SoC is to derive some of the AI performance and intelligence that it has created with the TPU and bring that down into a mobile SoC. It seems odd that Google would try to claim the SoC as their own even though Samsung is heavily involved in the manufacturing and modem and likely some of the chip design as well. Many people believe that Google’s Tensor SoC is more akin to a Samsung Exynos semi-custom design and according to some code that Anandtech’s Andrei Frumusanu found, it probably is along those lines. But now the embargo for reviews has lifted and I’ve had an opportunity to test the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro’s tensor SoC. But the Pixel 6 and its Tensor chip can hold its own against any other Android handset.We recently covered some of the details around Google’s Tensor SoC at the launch of the Pixel 6 and Tensor SoC that Google had. The iPhone 13 models still remain the kings of smartphone performance. Furthermore, the superior performance on graphics testing and video transcoding should alleviate any concerns you have about the Pixel 6's performance relative to other Android devices. Geekbench results for the Pixel 6 models may not match what you would get from a Snapdragon 888-powered phone, but the results are close enough for most users. (Note that we don't have numbers for the RedMagic 6S Pro here, as Adobe Premiere Rush isn't compatible with that phone.) Pixel 6 performance outlook They've posted the best time among Android phones, with both the Pixel 6 (49 seconds) and Pixel 6 Pro (48 seconds) besting the Galaxy Z Fold 3's 50-second result. However, the Pixel 6 models both do well here. Both the iPhone 13 and iPhone 13 Pro Max were able to transcode the video in less than 30 seconds, with the larger of the two iPhones posting the best time. Stop us if we're repeating ourselves, but Apple continues to win this test handily. Typically, this is an area where iPhones dominate, though we've seen some Android devices inching closer.Īdobe Premiere Rush transcode time (Mins:Secs) We take a 4K video clip and convert it to 1080p, timing how long it takes each phone to finish the task. Our favorite involves video transcoding using the Adobe Premiere Rush app. We also try to run real-world tests that mimic activities you'd perform in everyday usage of your phone. That's well ahead of either Pixel 6 model. And the Snapdragon 888 Plus in the Nubia phone is particularly geared toward boosting graphics performance, making the Pixel 6 Pro's result even more impressive.Īgain, Apple's phones are the pace-setters on this test, with the iPhone 13 and iPhone 13 Pro Max producing scores of 55.9 and 68.4 FPS, respectively. The Pixel 6 Pro does even better, with its FPS result topping the RedMagic 6S Pro's 35.2 FPS and Galaxy S21 Ultra. The Pixel 6 fares much better when it comes to gaming, with results on 3DMark's Wild Life Unlimited matching most Android phones.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |